Bibliography

Paine T., Letter to the Abbé Raynal on the Affair of North America; in which the mistakes in the AbbÈs account of the revolution of America are corrected and cleared up, in Kuklick B. (ed.), Paine: Political Writings (2d ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge – New York 2000;

Palazzolo, M. I., la nascita del diritto d’autore in italia, Viella, Roma, 2013;

Palmer T. G., Intellectual Property: La nascita del diritto d’autore in Italia A Non-Posnerian Law and Economics Approach, in “Hamline Law Review”, 12, 1989, pp. 261 ss.;

Panckoucke C.-J., Sur l’’état actuel de l’’imprimerie, in ““Mercure de France””, Samedi 6 mars 1790, Moutard, Paris 1790, pp. 32 ss.;

Pardo J. R., Copyright and Multimedia, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2003;

Parent A., Le métiers du livre à Paris au XVIe siécle (1535-1560), Droz, Geneve 1974;

Parks S. (ed.), The Literary Property Debate: Six Tracts 1764-1774, Garland, New York 1975;

Pascuzzi G., Il diritto fra tomi e bit: generi letterari ed ipertesti, Cedam, Padova 1997;

Pascuzzi G., Il diritto dell’era digitale², Il Mulino, Bologna 2006;

Pascuzzi G., Giuristi si diventa. Come riconoscere e apprendere le abilità proprie delle professioni legali, Il Mulino, Bologna 2008;

Patry W., Moral Panics and the Copyright Wars, Oxford University Press, Oxford–New York, 2009;

Patterson L. R., Copyright in Historical Perspective, Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville Tn. 1968;

Patterson L. R., Free Speech, Copyright, and Fair Use,in “ Vanderbilt Law Review”, 40, 1987, pp. 1 ss.;

Patterson L. R., Copyright in the New Millennium: Resolving the Conflict between Property Rights and Political Rights, in “Ohio State Law Journal”, 62, 2001, pp. 703 ss.;

Patterson L. R., Joyce C., Monopolizing the Law: The Scope of Copyright Protection for Law Reports and Statutory Compilations, in “UCLA Law Review”, 36, 1989, pp. 719 ss.;

Patterson L. R., Birch, Jr. S. F., A Unified Theory of Copyright (a cura di Joyce C.), in “Houston Law Review”, 46, 2009, pp. 215 ss.;

Payne D. C., Patronage and the Dramatic Marketplace under Charles I and II, in “The Yearbook of English Studies”, 21, 1991, pp. 137 ss.

Peeler C. D., From the Providence of Kings to Copyrighted Things (and French Moral Rights), in “Indiana International and Comparative Law Review”, 9, 1999, pp. 423 ss.;

Pellet M., Élysée Loustallot et les Révolutions de Paris (juillet 1789-septembre 1790), Le Chevalier, Paris 1872;

Pellicani L., Saggio sulla genesi del capitalismo. Alle origini della modernità, Milano 1988;

Peremboom R. P., Law and Morality in Ancient China. The Silk Manuscript of Huang-Lao, State University of New York Press, Albany N.Y. 1993;

Peterson J., Lockean Property and Literary Works, in “Legal Theory”, 14, 2008, pp. 257 ss.;

Pettegree A., Centre and Periphery in the European Book World, in “Transactions of the Royal Historical Society”, 18, 2008, pp. 101 ss.;

Picard E., Embriologie juridique: nouvelle classification des droits, droits international privé, droits intellectuels, in “Journal du droit international privé et de la jurisprudence comparée”, 10, 1883, pp. 565 ss.;

Piker R. C., From Edison to the Broadcast Flag: Mechanism of Consent and Refusal and the Propertization of Copyright, in “Chicago Law Review”, 70, 2003, pp. 281 ss.;

Picker R. C., The Mediated Book, 2009;

Picker R. C., The Google Book Search Settlement: A New Orphan-Works Monopoly?, 2009;

Picker R. C., Assessing Competition Issues in the Amended Google Book Search Settlement, 2009;

Pike L. O., A Constitutional History of the House of Lords: From Original Sources, Franklin, New York 1960;

Piola Caselli E., Codice del diritto d’autore. Commentario della nuova legge 22 aprile 1941-XIX, n.633,UTET, Torino 1943;

Plant M., The English Book Trade: An Economic History of the Making and Sale of Books (2d ed.), Allen & Unwin, London 1965;

Ploman E., Hamilton L. C., Copyright: Intellectual Property in the Information Age, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 1980;

Posner E. A., Law and Social Norms, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass. 2000;

Posner R. A., Blackstone and Bentham, in “Journal of Law and Economics”, 19, 1976, pp. 569 ss.;

Posner R. A., Il piccolo libro del plagio, Elliot, Roma 2007;

Post G. et al., The Medieval Heritage of a Humanistic Ideal: Scientia Donum Dei Est, Unde Vendi Non Potest, in “Traditio”, 11, 1955, pp. 195 ss.;

Pouillet E., Traité théorique et pratique de la propriété littéraire et artistique et du droit de représentation, Marchal et Billard, Paris 1879;

Prescott P., The Origin of Copyright: A Debunking View, in “European Intellectual Property Review” 12, 1989, pp. 453 ss.;

Price W. H., The English Patents of Monopoly, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass. 1913;

Pugliese G., Dalle «res incorporales» del diritto romano ai beni immateriali di alcuni sistemi giuridici moderni, in “Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile”, 1982, pp. 1137 ss.;

Putnam G. H, Literary Property, An Historical Sketch, in Putnam G. H. (ed.), The Question of Copyright, G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York 1891, pp. 36 ss.;

Putnam G. H., The Censorship of the Church of Rome. And Its Influence Upon the Production and Distribution of Literature, Vol. I, Benjamin Blom, New York 1967 (orig. ed. id., G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York-London 1906);

Quaglioni D., I concili del medioevo e dell’età moderna, in Aubert R., Fedalto G., Quaglioni D., Storia dei concili, Edizioni Paoline, Cinisello Balsamo 1995, pp. 102 ss.;

Quesnay F., Il “Tableau économique” e altri scritti di economia (a cura di M. Ridolfi), ISEDI, Milano 1973;